PVC Education and the Strategy Office
You need AI capability at scale, aligned to institutional policy, with a clear return you can report.
WorkSmart-AI are AI specialists, helping universities, colleges and schools become more productive with AI, through staff and student training built around each institution’s own policy and tools.
AI training specialists improving capability, confidence and compliance.
A free, confidential 30-minute call and a written report you keep.

Built by former Digital Skills Leads at the University of Exeter.
Worked with the University of Southampton.
Services
Whether you need to lift staff capability, equip students for an AI-shaped workplace, coach an individual academic, or support your leadership team to lead adoption, we build it around your policy and tools.
Any public or private organisation
A free 30-minute call and a written report placing your team on the AI Use Hierarchy, with two or three next steps.
Staff and leaders
Face-to-face or online, from one hour to a full day: INSET, away days, leadership workshops, keynotes and talks.
All staff, all students
Self-paced, interactive courses hosted on the WorkSmart-AI Academy or white-labelled for your own LMS.
Senior leaders
One-to-one or small-group coaching for senior leaders on leading AI adoption: strategy, policy and a phased roadmap.
Academics and research teams
Discipline and role-specific coaching for research, writing, grant work and teaching preparation.
Courses
Run as workshops or online courses. Student courses are white-labelled only.
A shared understanding of AI in your role: what’s appropriate, what’s risky, and how to prompt Copilot well.
Draft emails and documents, run meetings and capture actions with Copilot in Outlook, Word and Teams.
Summarise documents in Word and turn data into tables and charts in Excel, checking results before use.
Build reusable agents in Copilot Studio and automate multi-step tasks with clear instructions and guardrails.
What changes when you move to licensed Microsoft 365 Copilot, and how to use it safely on your own files.
Go beyond drafting: complex multi-step work, reusable prompts and grounding Copilot in your own documents.
Create and adapt teaching materials aligned to learning outcomes, checking accuracy and accessibility.
Bring AI into live teaching to support discussion and active learning, and guide responsible student use.
Design assessments that hold up in an AI-enabled world, and use Copilot to support marking and feedback.
Use AI for literature reviews, synthesis and early writing, while judging outputs for methodological soundness.
Map workflows, assess risk and plan where Copilot and Power Automate can redesign routine processes.
Write audience-specific communications across channels, reviewed for accuracy, inclusivity and reputation.
Know when AI support is appropriate in your studies, spot the risks, and prompt Copilot for reliable results.
Use AI the way employers now expect, with the judgement to know when it helps and when it doesn’t.
How it fits together
Most institutions start with the free AI Capability Check, then build up as their staff do.
Who we work with
We work with the people tasked with turning AI curiosity into
institution-wide confidence, capability and compliance.
You need AI capability at scale, aligned to institutional policy, with a clear return you can report.
You need consistent, role-specific training for academic and professional services staff, measured against published outcomes.
You need more staff using approved tools like Copilot well, and fewer using unapproved ones.
You need students who know what is allowed in their studies and what employers expect.
“AI is the second most cited challenge [for HE] again this year [2025] ...the full potential of AI can only be unlocked if the staff are well-trained and confident in using these new technologies responsibly.”
Jisc Leadership Survey 2025
A structured path
Five levels, from first use to institutional capability. Every course, workshop and AI Capability Check is mapped against it, with capability, confidence and compliance measured at each level.
Using everyday AI assistants to draft, summarise and question. The starting point for most staff.
Applying a framework (Role, Context, Task) to get reliable, repeatable outputs.
Building reusable assistants with set instructions, tone and knowledge.
Designing agents and multi-step workflows with checks and handoffs.
Connecting AI into team and institutional systems, and coordinating several tools.
| L1 Conversational AI | L2 Structured Prompting | L3 Custom Configuration | L4 Agents and Workflows | L5 Integration and Orchestration | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | Uses an AI assistant to draft, summarise and question, refining through conversation | Uses the R-C-T framework and reusable prompts for reliable, repeatable results | Builds reusable assistants with set instructions, tone and knowledge | Designs and runs agents and multi-step workflows with checks and handoffs | Connects AI into team or institutional systems and coordinates several tools |
| Confidence | Willing to try AI on low-risk tasks; knows its limits | Uses AI routinely without step-by-step help; trusts own judgement on outputs | Shares tools with colleagues; adapts when tools change | Hands off multi-step work to AI while staying accountable | Leads others’ adoption and makes the case for change |
| Compliance | Follows the AI policy; no sensitive data in unapproved tools; checks outputs | Applies the Green/Amber/Red Decision Matrix to choose suitable tasks | Configures with approved data sources, permissions and guardrails | Builds human checkpoints, data handling and audit trails into workflows | Owns governance: risk assessment, accountability, monitoring |
The evidence
37%
of HE institutions have delivered AI staff development (44% in FE).
68%
of students say AI skills are essential, but only 48% feel staff are helping them develop them.
39%
of AI users have had AI training from their employer.
“Students overwhelmingly see AI as essential for their futures, but many do not feel adequately supported to develop the necessary skills. If universities want graduates to feel prepared for the future, then AI literacy and capability must be embedded across the curriculum. These skills cannot be treated as optional.”
Charlotte Armstrong, Policy Manager, Higher Education Policy Institute - HEPI/Kortext Student Generative AI Survey 2026
Both founders are former Digital Skills Leads at the University of Exeter, and higher education is our home sector. That context shapes every workshop we design and every conversation we have with your team.
Understanding how universities operate and the technology used, means we can jump straight into helping you directly with your specific need.
Appreciating the time, capacity and anxiety pressures that can exist, we use a people-first approach, to offer flexibility and support every step of the way.
This isn’t theory for us. It’s the world we came from.
Meet the team →
AI Savings Calculator
Limited and sporadic AI use isn’t free. Staff are spending hours on tasks that could be done in seconds if they were AI capable. The AI Savings Calculator estimates what a coordinated approach could reclaim.

Free resource
A short guide that takes a single task most staff already do, and shows how it changes as staff move up the AI Use Hierarchy: from a quick prompt to a full agentic workflow.
Download the Higher Education Use Case GuideWhere does your institution stand?
A confidential 30-minute conversation, followed by a written report on where your teams sit on the AI Use Hierarchy and two or three next steps. No pitch, no slides, no obligation.
Book your free AI Capability CheckCan we use analytics cookies?
We'd like to use Google Analytics to see which pages people visit, so we can improve the site. Google sets these cookies and receives the data. Nothing is set unless you accept. Cookie Policy